EB-1 Visa Guide 2026: Qualifications, Process, Evidence, RFEs, and Common Mistakes EB1 Lawyer & New York Immigration Lawyer Complete Guide
EB-1 Visa Guide 2026: Qualifications, Process, Evidence, RFEs, and Common Mistakes
EB1 Lawyer & New York Immigration Lawyer Complete Guide
Author: New York Immigration Lawyer Alena Shautsova
If you are a scientist, entrepreneur, professor, researcher, artist, physician, engineer, or other high-achieving professional, the EB-1 immigrant visa category may allow you to obtain a U.S. green card based on extraordinary ability or outstanding achievements.
The EB-1 category is one of the most prestigious immigration classifications because it is reserved for individuals who have reached the top of their field. When approved, EB-1 cases often lead to faster permanent residence than other employment-based categories.
However, EB-1 petitions are also among the most complex immigration filings. USCIS carefully examines each application and often issues Requests for Evidence (RFEs) when documentation is incomplete or poorly organized.
Understanding the legal standards, evidence requirements, and case law behind EB-1 petitions can dramatically improve your chances of success.
In this comprehensive guide you will learn:
- EB-1 visa categories and qualifications
• The Kazarian case law framework used in EB-1 analysis
• Recent USCIS policy updates affecting EB-1 petitions
• Step-by-step explanation of the EB-1 immigration process
• Whether you can file Adjustment of Status concurrently
• What to do if you receive an RFE
• Common mistakes that lead to EB-1 denials
• A sample evidence checklist for EB-1 petitions
• Frequently asked questions about EB-1 immigration.
If you are considering an EB-1 petition, speaking with an experienced EB1 lawyer and New York immigration lawyer can help you structure your case effectively.
What Is the EB-1 Visa?
The EB-1 visa is an employment-based immigrant visa category under INA §203(b)(1) that allows certain individuals with exceptional achievements to obtain lawful permanent residence in the United States. Legislative history indicates that this category of visas is intended “for the small percentage of individuals who have risen to the very top of their field of endeavor.”
Unlike most employment-based immigration categories, EB-1 does not require labor certification, which significantly simplifies the process.
The EB-1 category contains three separate classifications:
EB-1A — Extraordinary Ability
This category is designed for individuals who have demonstrated extraordinary ability in sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics.
Examples include:
- leading scientists
• internationally recognized artists
• innovative entrepreneurs
• elite athletes
• prominent researchers.
One major advantage of EB-1A is that you do not need an employer sponsor. You may self-petition, meaning you file the case on your own behalf.
EB-1B — Outstanding Professors and Researchers
This category applies to professors or researchers who have international recognition for their academic achievements.
Requirements include:
- at least three years of research or teaching experience
• a tenure-track or permanent research position
• sponsorship by a U.S. employer.
EB-1C — Multinational Executives and Managers
EB-1C is designed for executives or managers who worked for a foreign company affiliated with a U.S. company.
Typical applicants include:
- multinational company executives
• international business managers
• startup founders expanding to the United States.
EB-1 Visa Qualifications
The EB-1 extraordinary ability category requires proof that you are among the small percentage at the very top of your field.
Initial Review
A two-part analysis is used to determine whether the beneficiary is an individual of extraordinary ability:
- First, we determine whether the petitioner has submitted evidence to show that the beneficiary:
- Has received a one-time achievement (a major internationally recognized award); or,
- Qualifies under at least three of the ten criteria required for this classification.
- Second, if the petitioner establishes that the beneficiary has received a one-time achievement (a major internationally recognized award), or meets at least three of the other criteria, we then determine whether the petitioner has submitted evidence demonstrating that the beneficiary:
- Has sustained national or international acclaim.
- In determining whether the beneficiary has enjoyed “sustained” national or international acclaim, such acclaim must be maintained. A beneficiary may have achieved extraordinary ability in the past but then failed to maintain a comparable level of acclaim thereafter; and,
- Has achievements that have been recognized in the field of expertise, indicating that the beneficiary is one of that small percentage who has risen to the very top of the field of endeavor.
USCIS regulations at 8 CFR §204.5(h) establish the evidence requirements.
You may qualify by showing either:
A Major International Award
Examples include:
- Nobel Prize
• Olympic Medal
• Pulitzer Prize.
Because such awards are rare, most applicants instead demonstrate eligibility by meeting at least three of ten evidentiary criteria.
Documentation of the beneficiary’s receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes and awards for excellence in the field of endeavor.
USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2 states:
First, USCIS determines if the person was the recipient of prizes or awards. Nothing precludes the person from relying on a team award, provided the person is one of the recipients of the award. The description of this type of evidence in the regulation indicates that the focus should be on the person’s receipt of the awards or prizes, as opposed to the employer’s receipt of the awards or prizes.
Second, USCIS determines whether the award is a lesser nationally or internationally recognized prize or award which the person received for excellence in the field of endeavor. As indicated by the plain language of the regulation, this criterion does not require an award or prize to have the same level of recognition and prestige associated with the Nobel Prize or another award that would qualify as a one-time achievement.
Examples of qualifying awards may include, but are not limited to:
- Certain awards from well-known national institutions or well-known professional associations;
• Certain doctoral dissertation awards; and
• Certain awards recognizing presentations at nationally or internationally recognized conferences.
Considerations:
Relevant considerations regarding whether the basis for granting the prizes or awards was excellence in the field include, but are not limited to:
- The criteria used to grant the awards or prizes;
• The national or international significance of the awards or prizes in the field;
• The number of awardees or prize recipients; and
• Limitations on competitors.
While many scholastic awards do not have the requisite level of recognition, there may be some that are nationally or internationally recognized as awards for excellence such that they may satisfy the requirements of this criterion.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
The Ten EB-1 Criteria
The EB-1 regulations list ten categories of evidence.
You must demonstrate at least three of the following:
- National or international awards for excellence
- Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
- Published material about you in major media
- Participation as a judge of the work of others
- Original contributions of major significance
- Authorship of scholarly articles
- Artistic exhibitions or showcases
- Leading or critical roles in distinguished organizations
- High salary or remuneration
- Commercial success in performing arts
However, meeting three criteria alone does not guarantee approval.
USCIS must also determine whether the evidence demonstrates sustained national or international acclaim.
This evaluation is heavily influenced by an important immigration case: Kazarian v. USCIS.
The Kazarian Case and EB-1 Legal Framework
The EB-1 evaluation process used today largely comes from the case:
Kazarian v. USCIS, 596 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010).
The case established a two-step adjudication process.
Step 1 — Regulatory Criteria Review
USCIS first determines whether the applicant submitted evidence meeting three of the ten criteria listed in the regulations.
This step is relatively straightforward.
Step 2 — Final Merits Determination
After the criteria are satisfied, USCIS conducts a final merits analysis.
The officer evaluates whether the evidence demonstrates that you are truly among the top professionals in your field.
This stage examines:
- the quality of evidence
• the impact of your work
• your level of recognition.
Many EB-1 petitions are denied during this second stage when applicants fail to explain why their achievements are significant.
A strong EB-1 petition therefore includes detailed legal arguments and contextual evidence.
Recent USCIS Policy Updates Affecting EB-1 Cases
USCIS periodically updates the USCIS Policy Manual to clarify how officers should evaluate EB-1 petitions.
Recent updates emphasize several important principles.
Recognition of Emerging Fields
USCIS acknowledges that extraordinary ability may arise in new and interdisciplinary fields, including:
- artificial intelligence
• biotechnology
• startup entrepreneurship
• digital media innovation.
Quality of Evidence Over Quantity
USCIS officers are instructed not to simply count documents.
Instead, they must evaluate the quality and credibility of evidence.
For example:
- a prestigious international award may carry more weight than multiple minor recognitions. A nomination for an award does not carry as much weight as winning! The awards and prizes must be in the field that the individual seeks entry. Mussarova v. Garland, 562 F Supp. 3d 837, 843-45 (C.D. Cal. 2022). (For example, where a person was seeking entry as a water polo coach, her awards received as a water polo PLAYER were not related to the filed she was seeking to enter the US for.)
When presenting evidence of membership in professional organizations, make sure to demonstrate that the membership is not based just because you achieved certain level of education or have a number of years of experience, the payment of a fee or subscription.
Published materials should be about the person, relating to the person’s work in the filed, not just about the person’s employer. Marketing materials are generally not considered as evidence. In determining whether to count this criterion, USCIS looks for the evidence of the “intended audience”, relative circulation, readership and viewership. Wikipedia, web portals, domains, blogs, social media: there are no assurances about the reliability of the content from these open, user-edited Internet sites. See Lamilem Badasa v. Michael Mukasey, 540 F.3d 909, 901–11 (8th Cir. 2008). Therefore, any documentation from Wikipedia, web portals, or social media sites carry no evidentiary weight within the present proceedings because there is no assurance of reliability or objectivity from these sources that allow for self-created material to be posted or from marketing webpages that promote a person or product.
Judging the work of others usually means that you judged your peers.
Performance in a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments that have distinguished reputation is a criterion that would fit former deans, CEOs, presidents, professors, etc.
Policy Manual states that: (i) leading role is for a person who is (or was) a leader within the organization or establishment or a division or department thereof; (ii) critical role is a person who has contributed in a way that is “of significant importance to the outcome of the organization” and may include a supporting role if the person’s performance in the role is (or was) important. It is not the title of the person’s role “but rather the person’s performance in the role that determines whether the role is (or was) critical.” Letters from persons with personal knowledge are “helpful”; and (iii) USCIS must determine that the organization or establishment, or the department or division for which the person holds a critical or leading role “has a distinguished reputation.” But the “size or longevity of an organization or establishment is not in and of itself a determining factor.” Look to “national rankings,” “receipt of government research grants,” and significant funding if startups as positive factors. 6 USCIS-PM, Pt. F, Ch. 2 ¶B.1, Criterion 8.
Examples of lead or critical roles may include, but are not limited to:
- Senior faculty or senior research position for a distinguished academic department or program;
- Senior research position for a distinguished non-academic institution or company;
- Principal or named investigator for a department, institution, or business that received a merit-based government award, such as an academic research or Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant;
- Member of a key committee within a distinguished organization;
- Founder or co-founder of, or contributor of intellectual property to, a startup business that has a distinguished reputation; and
- Leading or critical role for a distinguished organization or a distinguished division of an institution or company, as explained in detail by the director or a principal investigator of the relevant organization or division.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Interestingly enough, lawyers are not covered! INS has taken the view that lawyers do not fall within the term of “science” or “arts” for EB1 purposes.
As a side note, a previous O1 approval does not compel approval of subsequent EB1!
Increased Scrutiny of Recommendation Letters
Reference letters are still essential in EB-1 petitions, but USCIS expects them to be:
- detailed
• credible
• written by recognized experts.
Letters that simply praise the applicant without explaining specific contributions often lead to RFEs. A person authoring the letter must also provide background on their qualifications. Statements made by witnesses must be corroborated by documentary evidence.
EB-1 Immigration Process Step-by-Step
Understanding the EB-1 process helps applicants prepare their cases strategically.
Step 1 — Evidence Collection
Before filing the petition, you should compile strong documentation demonstrating your education, background, and achievements demonstrate your extraordinary ability.
Start with ordering an evaluation of your education credentials. Make sure then you have a professional CV or resume, proof of our work experience and achievements, including
- recognition in your field
• original contributions
• influence or leadership.
This stage typically involves gathering publications and citations, documenting awards and its background, criteria for the awards, obtaining expert reference letters, ordering professional translations. Note it is not possible to attach video evidence. You can only attach screenshots or transcripts.
Step 2 — Filing Form I-140
The EB-1 petition is filed using Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker.
For EB-1A, you may self-petition.
For EB-1B and EB-1C, the petition must be filed by a U.S. employer.
Note: you will have to choose the “profession” you are trying to apply for as an EB 1/ extraordinary ability worker. USCIS will consider all your evidence as they relate to the chosen profession.
Step 3 — USCIS Review
USCIS reviews the petition and may:
- approve the petition
• issue an RFE (Request for Evidence)
• deny the case.
Premium processing is available for EB-1 petitions. However, the premium processing speeds up the consideration of the form I 140, not I 485 or related forms if they are filed concurrently.
Step 4 — Green Card Application
After approval, the next step depends on your location.
If You Are in the United States
You may file Form I-485 Adjustment of Status. Many choose to submit this form together with the form I 140 if the category is current per visa bulletin.
If You Are Outside the United States
You will complete immigrant visa processing at a U.S. consulate.
Concurrent Adjustment of Status
In some cases you may file Form I-140 and Form I-485 at the same time.
This is called concurrent filing.
It is possible when your priority date is current in the Visa Bulletin.
Many applicants from countries without visa backlogs can benefit from this strategy.
Concurrent filing provides important advantages:
- eligibility for a work permit (EAD)
• ability to obtain advance parole travel permission
• faster access to permanent residence.
However, applicants from countries with high demand may face visa retrogression, which prevents concurrent filing.
What to Do If You Receive an EB-1 RFE
Receiving an RFE can be stressful, but it does not mean your case will be denied.
In many cases, RFEs simply indicate that USCIS wants additional clarification or documentation.
Responding properly is critical.
Common EB-1 RFE Issues
Several problems frequently appear in RFEs.
Poor Translations
USCIS requires certified English translations for all foreign documents.
Common problems include:
- missing translator certifications
• incomplete translations
• inaccurate terminology.
Trying to Prove Talent in Multiple Fields
Some applicants attempt to argue they are accomplished in several unrelated areas.
This often weakens the petition.
USCIS prefers a clearly defined field of expertise.
Weak Reference Letters
Letters may be questioned when:
- the author’s credentials are unclear
• the relationship with the applicant is not explained
• the letter contains general praise without specific examples.
Awards Without Context
Awards must include evidence demonstrating:
- how competitive the award is
• the reputation of the awarding organization
• the number of recipients.
Articles That Only Mention Your Name
Many applicants submit media articles where their name appears briefly.
If the article is not primarily about you, USCIS may reject it as evidence.
Missing Citations for Publications
If you claim authorship of scholarly work, you should include:
- journal rankings
• citation statistics
• DOI references
• impact factors.
Sample Evidence Checklist for EB-1 Petitions
Every EB-1 case is different, but strong petitions often include the following evidence.
Awards and Honors
Documentation showing:
- national or international prizes
• recognition by respected organizations.
Publications
Evidence of authorship, such as:
- peer-reviewed journal articles
• books or book chapters.
Citation Evidence
Scholarly impact may be demonstrated through:
- Google Scholar citation reports
• academic indexes.
Media Coverage
Articles or interviews discussing your work.
These should clearly highlight your achievements.
Expert Recommendation Letters
Letters from recognized experts explaining:
- the significance of your work
• your influence within the field.
Judging Activities
Evidence that you have evaluated the work of others, such as:
- peer review
• academic conference judging.
Leadership Roles
Evidence that you played an important role in:
- distinguished organizations
• research teams
• major projects.
Salary Evidence
Contracts or industry reports demonstrating compensation above typical levels.
Common EB-1 Mistakes That Lead to Denials
Many EB-1 petitions fail because applicants misunderstand the legal requirements.
Common mistakes include:
- submitting documents without explanation
• relying on weak recommendation letters
• providing irrelevant evidence
• failing to show national or international recognition
• ignoring USCIS policy guidance.
Successful EB-1 petitions are not simply document collections.
They are carefully structured legal arguments supported by credible evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions About EB-1
Can I apply for EB-1 from outside the United States?
Yes. You may file Form I-140 while living abroad and complete the green card process through consular processing.
Do I need an employer for EB-1?
For EB-1A extraordinary ability, no employer sponsor is required.
How long does the EB-1 process take?
Processing times vary depending on:
- USCIS workload
• visa availability
• whether premium processing is used.
A typical EB1 I 140 petition without premium processing takes about a year to be considered.
Can entrepreneurs qualify for EB-1?
Yes. Entrepreneurs may qualify if they demonstrate extraordinary ability in business or innovation.
Is EB-1 better than EB-2 NIW?
Both categories allow self-petition.
However, EB-1 has higher evidentiary standards but often results in faster green card processing.
Practical Tips for Building a Strong EB-1 Petition
If you are preparing an EB-1 case, consider the following strategies:
- clearly define your field of expertise
• document the significance of your achievements
• obtain credible expert recommendation letters
• present evidence in a logical legal framework.
A well-prepared petition explains not only what you accomplished, but why it matters.
Speak With an EB1 Lawyer and New York Immigration Lawyer
The EB-1 visa is one of the most powerful immigration pathways for highly accomplished professionals.
However, the standards are strict, and preparing a successful petition requires careful legal analysis.
If you are considering an EB-1 case or received a Request for Evidence, consulting an experienced EB1 lawyer and New York immigration lawyer can help you build the strongest possible application.
📞 917-885-2261
Learn more about immigration options at
www.shautsova.com
