We are thrilled to announce that FREE GUIDES are available now!
Just get your GUIDES here
FREE GUIDES
UKRAINE COUNTRY CONDITIONS & U.S. ASYLUM
Understand what human rights reports document, how those findings
relate to asylum eligibility, and what evidence can help explain
your individual risk.
By Alena Shautsova, New York Immigration Lawyer
Updated November 14, 2026
Yes, when the individual facts satisfy U.S. asylum law.
A Ukrainian applicant may qualify by establishing past persecution
or a well-founded fear of persecution connected to religion,
political opinion, nationality, race, or membership in a particular
social group. War-related danger alone does not establish that
required connection. Other eligibility requirements and applicable
bars must also be addressed.
Sources:
USCIS Form I-589 instructions
and
INA § 208, 8 U.S.C. § 1158
.
A family may leave Ukraine after its apartment building is destroyed.
A journalist may escape detention connected to reporting on the
occupation. A religious believer may flee threats connected to
worship. Each needs safety, but an asylum application must explain
the particular reason that person fears persecution.
Country conditions help establish the setting in which the harm
occurred. The application must also identify the feared persecutor,
explain the motive, and connect the reports to the applicant’s
circumstances. Conditions under Russian occupation must be
distinguished from conditions in Ukrainian-controlled territory.
In March 2026, the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine
described discriminatory policies in Russian-occupied territory
that forced people from their homes and obstructed return.
The mission identified harm connected to nationality, political
opinion, cultural identity, religious affiliation, and sexual
orientation. Its findings included threats, detention, torture,
and ill-treatment.
The report addressed coerced Russian citizenship, conscription
into Russian forces, and restrictions on fundamental freedoms.
These findings help explain why someone might fear being
identified as disloyal to occupation authorities.
Source:
UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, March 20, 2026
.
Human Rights Watch’s World Report 2026, covering events
in 2025, describes pressure to accept Russian passports through
threats and restrictions involving health care, education,
employment, property, and movement. It also documents the
suppression of Ukrainian language and identity in occupied areas.
Source:
Human Rights Watch, World Report 2026: Ukraine
.
How this relates to your case:
Identify whether the documented policies affected you,
your family, or people with the same relevant characteristics.
Describe the location, dates, demands, and consequences
of refusing to comply.
Political opinion can involve what a person believes and
what the persecutor believes that person supports. An asylum
claim may concern public statements, journalism, community work,
or conduct interpreted as support for Ukraine.
A February 2026 OHCHR fact sheet documents restrictions on
expression in occupied territory, including penalties for
statements about the war and displays of Ukrainian identity.
It describes convictions involving legitimate journalistic
activity and expression.
Source:
OHCHR, Four Years On: occupation and fundamental freedoms,
February 2026
.
Explain how the feared authorities learned about you.
Was your phone searched? Did an interrogator refer to a
social media post? Did threats mention volunteer activity
or a relative’s work? Record the words used during
questioning as accurately as you can.
Consider a hypothetical teacher threatened after refusing
an occupation authority’s demand. The declaration should
explain the demand, the teacher’s response, and the connection
between the retaliation and a protected ground. A general
account of difficult working conditions leaves those
questions unanswered.
The UN General Assembly’s resolution on occupied Ukrainian
territory calls for the removal of discriminatory restrictions
affecting religious groups, including the Orthodox Church of
Ukraine, Muslim Crimean Tatars, and Jehovah’s Witnesses.
It addresses access to worship and religious practice.
Source:
UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/79/184
.
OHCHR’s report covering December 2024 through May 2025
also describes the targeting of religious organizations
by occupation authorities. It notes that organizations
affiliated with the Orthodox Church of Ukraine or Jehovah’s
Witnesses were not registered in occupied territory
as of May 1, 2025.
Source:
OHCHR, 42nd periodic report, June 2025
.
There are also documented concerns involving Ukraine’s
treatment of religious organizations. OHCHR’s report
covering June through August 2024 raised human rights
concerns about Law No. 3894-IX and restrictions on
religious organizations affiliated with the Russian
Orthodox Church.
Source:
OHCHR, 40th periodic report, paragraphs 114–115
.
Later reporting discusses measures involving the Ukrainian
Orthodox Church. A 2026 UN report records concerns expressed
by independent experts in October 2025 about restrictions
on worship and proceedings affecting clergy and others.
Source:
UN report A/HRC/61/72, paragraph 34
.
Identify the correct religious institution.
The Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the Orthodox Church of
Ukraine are distinct institutions. Explain your actual
affiliation, religious practice, and personal experience.
Membership alone does not establish persecution.
A criminal allegation involving a believer or religious
leader also requires examination of the underlying conduct,
motive, treatment, and procedural safeguards. The application
should explain what makes the feared treatment persecution
connected to religion or another protected ground.
Freedom House’s 2026 assessment of Russian-occupied Ukrainian
territory describes especially acute repression of Crimean
Tatars, many of whom opposed the occupation. It also documents
pressure on Ukrainian citizens to accept Russian passports
and consequences for refusing.
Source:
Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2026:
Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine
.
Ethnicity, religion, and political opinion may overlap.
Explain each connection supported by the facts.
A threat may refer to ethnic identity, worship,
political activity, or several characteristics.
Language requires context as well. Speaking Russian or
Ukrainian does not by itself establish an asylum claim.
Document who objected to your language, what happened,
and whether it was treated as evidence of nationality
or political allegiance.
A July 2026 UN publication discusses LGBTQI+ survivors of
conflict-related sexual violence in occupied Ukraine.
It identifies risks connected to actual or perceived
sexual orientation, including in detention.
Source:
United Nations in Ukraine, July 1, 2026
.
Human Rights Watch’s World Report 2025, covering
2024, reports homophobic and transphobic violence in
Ukrainian-controlled territory. The same section notes
growing public support for equal rights. Both findings
belong in an accurate assessment.
Source:
Human Rights Watch, World Report 2025: Ukraine
.
Claims involving sexual orientation or gender identity
may involve membership in a particular social group.
The group and the connection to the harm require
legal analysis. Applicants should have an opportunity
to discuss sensitive experiences privately.
Bring your immigration notices, prior applications,
and available evidence to a consultation. A case review
can identify the protected grounds, missing records,
and deadlines that need attention.
The applicant must establish the required connection
between persecution and a protected ground. Religion,
nationality, race, political opinion, or membership
in a particular social group must be at least one
central reason for the persecution. Asylum also
involves discretion and statutory restrictions.
Source:
8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)
.
The government may be the persecutor. Harm by private
actors may also qualify where the government is unable
or unwilling to provide protection.
In Matter of C-G-T-, the Board explained that
failure to report private abuse is not necessarily fatal
when reporting would have been futile or dangerous.
Explain what protection was available, whether you
requested assistance, and what response you received.
Sources:
EOIR asylum eligibility guide
;
Matter of C-G-T-, 28 I&N Dec. 740 (BIA 2023)
.
Internal relocation can be important when the feared
harm involves occupation authorities in a particular
region. The analysis considers whether another location
could avoid persecution and whether relocation would be
reasonable. Burdens and presumptions require review
under the rules governing the individual case.
Source:
8 C.F.R. § 1208.13
.
Prepare a history of attempted moves. Include the
destination, dates, living arrangements, threats,
and reasons the move failed. A person who fears
a different persecutor in Ukrainian-controlled
territory needs evidence addressing that threat
separately.
Asylum generally carries a one-year filing deadline
after arrival, with exceptions for qualifying changed
or extraordinary circumstances. An exception requires
a supported explanation. Criminal history, firm
resettlement, and other statutory bars may also
affect eligibility.
Source:
8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)–(b)
.
Tell counsel about every country where you lived,
any residence status offered or obtained, previous
applications, and prior immigration decisions.
Keep supporting documents even if you believe
a stay abroad was temporary.
Use this checklist to organize a consultation or
review a pending application. Include genuine
evidence relevant to your circumstances.
Preserve originals and obtain complete translations
where required. If an expected record is unavailable,
document efforts to obtain it and discuss the
explanation with counsel.
| Issue | What to Explain | Possible Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Political opinion | The opinion attributed to you and how you know it motivated the harm. |
Threats, interrogation accounts, posts, witness statements. |
| Religion | Your affiliation, practice, and specific mistreatment. |
Congregation records, summonses, searches, testimony. |
| Ethnicity or nationality | How identity affected your selection or treatment. |
Identity records, messages, locality-specific reports. |
| Sexual orientation or gender identity | Targeted abuse and the protection available to you. |
Threats, witness accounts, relevant medical records. |
| Internal relocation | Why the proposed destination would not provide reasonable safety. |
Prior moves, continuing threats, family and medical circumstances. |
Identify each report’s publication date and reporting
period. A 2026 annual report may describe events in 2025.
Older reports can explain earlier experiences, while
current evidence helps assess future risk. Select the
relevant passages and explain their connection to
your circumstances.
No. The application must establish the connection
between persecution and a protected ground,
together with the other requirements.
Countrywide insecurity provides background
but does not replace that showing.
Religious persecution can support asylum.
Identify the church, location, feared actor,
and specific harm. Evidence about one
institution should not be presented as
describing every Orthodox believer.
Yes. A claim can involve persecution by
occupation authorities. The applicant must
still establish the legal elements and
address protection, relocation, and other
applicable requirements.
Explain why. Matter of C-G-T- recognizes
that reporting private harm may be futile
or dangerous. Provide facts supporting
that explanation.
Review it with counsel. Identify relevant
changes in threats, family circumstances,
evidence, and country conditions.
Updates must remain accurate and explain
corrections to the earlier account.
Your application should explain who would harm you,
why they would target you, and what evidence
supports your fear.
The Law Office of Alena Shautsova
assists with affirmative asylum, immigration court
defense, and immigration appeals. Schedule a
consultation to review your history, evidence,
and next steps.
Or visit
www.shautsova.com
to schedule a consultation.
General information based on the sources identified
above, reviewed November 14, 2026. Eligibility,
procedural rules, and the effect of court orders
require review of the individual case.